翻訳と辞書
Words near each other
・ Gallager
・ Gallager carbine
・ Gallagh Road railway station
・ Gallagher
・ Gallagher (comedian)
・ Gallagher (surname)
・ Gallagher Amendment
・ Gallagher and Lyle
・ Gallagher and Shean
・ Gallagher Building
・ Gallagher Center
・ Gallagher Convention Centre
・ Gallagher Elementary School
・ Gallagher Flint Station Archeological Site
・ Gallagher Group (UK)
Gallagher Index
・ Gallagher Mansion and Outbuilding
・ Gallagher Park
・ Gallagher Park (Edmonton)
・ Gallagher Ridge
・ Gallagher Ridge, New Brunswick
・ Gallagher Stadium
・ Gallagher Township, Clinton County, Pennsylvania
・ Gallagher v Post Office
・ Gallagher v Young
・ Gallagher v. Crown Kosher Super Market of Massachusetts, Inc.
・ Gallagher v. Lambert
・ Gallagher's free-tailed bat
・ Gallagher's Gallery
・ Gallagher's Steakhouse


Dictionary Lists
翻訳と辞書 辞書検索 [ 開発暫定版 ]
スポンサード リンク

Gallagher Index : ウィキペディア英語版
Gallagher Index

The Gallagher Index (or least squares index) is used to measure the disproportionality of an electoral outcome; that is, the difference between the percentage of votes received, and the percentage of seats a party gets in the resulting legislature. This is especially useful for comparing proportionality across electoral systems. The index involves taking the square root of half the sum of the squares of the difference between percent of vote and percent of seats for each of the political parties.
: \mathrm = \sqrt \sum_^n ( V_i-S_i ) ^2}
The index weighs the deviations by their own value, creating a responsive index, ranging from 0 to 100. The lower the index value the lower the disproportionality and vice versa. Michael Gallagher, who created the index, included 'other' parties as a whole category, and Arend Lijphart modified it, excluding those parties. Unlike the well-known Loosemore–Hanby index, the Gallagher index is less sensitive to small discrepancies.
== Example of calculating disproportionality ==

This table uses the New Zealand 2005 election result. Note that since New Zealand uses the MMP voting system, voters have two votes. This list uses the ''party vote'', which determines the proportionality of the House; the ''electorate vote'' determines the local member.
Thus the disproportionality of the 2005 New Zealand election is 1.13, which is very low by international standards.
Note that the Māori Party has the highest difference, which is significantly above the others. This is due to New Zealand's system of reserved seats for Māori. The Māori seats are allocated by votes on a separate electoral roll, and while any party can contest these seats, they are generally won by either the Māori Party, the Labour Party, or New Zealand First.

抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア(Wikipedia)
ウィキペディアで「Gallagher Index」の詳細全文を読む



スポンサード リンク
翻訳と辞書 : 翻訳のためのインターネットリソース

Copyright(C) kotoba.ne.jp 1997-2016. All Rights Reserved.